writing assignment 659

/in /by

Find a recent news article relevant to anthropology (preferably Physical Anthropology) and/or issues discussed in the course. Since anthropology touches on so many aspects of humans, there are numerous topics that would qualify, even if anthropology is not specifically mentioned in the article. It should be long and “meaty” enough so that you can provide a decent summary of it.

The article should be less than two years old and come from one of the following news sources:

Include a link to the article or copy and paste the web address of the article. Then, in approximately 200-300 words, do the following:

1. Briefly summarize the article in your own words. What did you find interesting about it?

2. Explain how the article is relevant to anthropology and or issues discussed in class. Which field or specialty within anthropology does it most closely relate to (such as genetics, primatology, human evolution, archaeology, etc).

nursing practicum 5

/in /by

Reflect and answer: Why is infection control part of everyone’s role in the world of nursing? Think of how not using infection control properly could affect the health care system and patients. Why is infection control so important? Include examples, and explain.

Your answer must be composed of 300-350 words, and you must include 2-3 peer reviewed articles to support your answer.

discussion 1 260

/in /by

For those who start a fresh thread: Write about what you think you might want to put in a zine, addressing these questions:

  • What argument would you like to try to make?
  • Do you think you’ll do that with images, text, or a combination of the two, and why?

Use the links to answer the questions:

http://www.sandiegozinefest.com/stolensharpie

https://thecreativeindependent.com/guides/how-to-m…

When answering these, think about using full paragraphs, and quoting passages from the text that comes to mind that help support your thoughts.

Please make your first post by Thursday, and follow up in another thread by the end of Sunday. So there will be reply.

discussion five 1

/in /by

  1. this first Discussion Forum, please introduce yourself to your classmates. At a minimum, include the following information your major or degree, career aspirations, whether you have taken an asynchronous (fully online) class before, why you registered for ANT 101 this summer, and any personal information you want to share (i.e. where you are from, family life, hopes/ dreams/ fears, etc.).
  2. Please answer the following questions based on the assigned text:
    1. Why is examining cultural assumptions important? What assumptions are made about your culture?
    2. Detachment and engagement are both necessary for participant observation research. Why do you think this would be difficult?
    3. Can you think of a group you would like to study? Who would it be and why?

Please review the Discussion Forum Evaluation Rubric in your syllabus.

All students are welcome to submit anytime before the due date of June 7th at 9 p.m. The Forum will close at 9 p.m.

50 points possible

professional venture capital 1

/in /by

  • Imagine you are a venture capitalist reviewing the business venture you have developed over this course. From this perspective, describe how you (as the venture capitalist) would conduct the due diligence for the business venture. Then, assess what you may learn from this process.
  • Of the steps in the venture capital process, indicate which step may be the most crucial to the majority of entrepreneurs. Assess how entrepreneurs can be prepared to handle this step successfully.

innovation catalysts 1

/in /by

For this assignment, create a PowerPoint or Google Slides presentation to present to your client that includes the following:

  • After reading the text and watching the videos, describe at least three examples of people, practices, and approaches that serve as catalysts for innovation (the book describes people as the catalysts, but for this assignment, you should list anything you find in the readings that spark and encourage innovation).
  • Then describe what can limit or destroy innovation in an organization. Be sure to cite from where you find your ideas, and make sure the text is one of your sources. Note that destroyers (not disrupters) or inhibitors keep innovation from happening in an organization. List three limiters/destroyers and briefly explain each.
  • Create a plan for how your client can promote innovation while addressing those behaviors, policies, and practices that destroy innovation. Add the plan to your presentation.
  • Finally, briefly describe disruptive innovation and provide an example. Then, think of a disruptive innovation for your client and describe it in your presentation.
  • Your last slide should include a list of references including any course materials you used.

correct the errors in the code

/in /by

I have a code and there are some errors and i they are specified.

The code is attached.

The errors:

Run 1:

Enter number of users and card number:

5

4246345689049834

6762875510376451

5572095122524082

6011875510376451

371916424402350

4388576018410707

4388576018410707

4388576018410707

4388576018410707 -> I expect only 5 times instead of 10 times.

Run 2:

Enter number of users and card number: -> Input is not matching with the requirements. Name missing.

1

6762875510376451

6762875510376451 -> Should only ask once.

6762875510376451’s Maestro Credit Card -> Name missing

6762875510376451 is invalid

Enter expiration date 4 digits MMYY: -> Part B should execute for the valid cards only

0522

Enter valid CVV number :

123

Valid -> Output not matching with requirements

BUILD SUCCESSFUL (total time: 1 minute 12 seconds)

Run 3:

Enter number of users and card number:

2

6011875510376451

5572095122524082

5572095122524082

6011875510376451 -> Invalid number of inputs, and again name missing

6011875510376451’s MasterCard Credit Card -> I expect this to be a Discover card

5572095122524082 is valid

Enter expiration date 4 digits MMYY: -> which card is this for??

0222

Enter valid CVV number :

123

Valid -> which card is valid?

5572095122524082’s Discover Credit Card -> I expect this to be a MasterCard

6011875510376451 is valid

Enter expiration date 4 digits MMYY: -> Same thing which for which card is this information from the above list

0120

Enter valid CVV number :

123

Card not valid -> Output not matching the requirements

directions 3

/in /by

Directions # 1

Read the article, Western Museums Should Repatriate Cultural Artefacts (Links to an external site.).(see the attachmnt ) Determine if you believe museums should return cultural artifacts to their country of origin or retain them.

Your Think 1: Pre-History response must be approximately 150 words and submitted as a text entry. Your response must begin with a statement of your position and contain narrative to support your opinion on this issue. You must provide a word count at the end of your text entry.

Directions #2

Your Think : Code of Hammurabi assignment requires you to read the laws found in https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Code_of_Hammurabi_(Harper_translation) Choose three laws from The Code of Hammurabi. Identify each code by its number, provide the exact wording of the code and translate the code into your own words. Indicate if the code is fair or not fair and explain why or why not. Do not use Code #143. Use the format provided in following example:

Example

Code #143. If she have not been a careful mistress, have gadded about, have neglected her house and have belittled her husband, that woman shall be thrown into the water.

If a wife is not a good wife, has gone out partying, and has made fun of her husband in front of others, then she will be thrown into the water.

I believe this code is not fair. Even though the woman might not have been a good wife, throwing her into the water is abusive. A better alternative would be for the husband and wife to discuss their marital problems and attempt to respectfully resolve them.

Your Think 2-3: The Code of Hammurabi assignment must be approximately 150 words and submitted as a text entry. You must provide a word count at the end of your text entry.

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCentral Idea
20.0 pts

The response has a strong central idea – it’s about something, and the test supports that idea.

 10.0 pts

The response has a central idea, but the writing doesn’t completely relate to that idea.

 5.0 pts

It’s kind of hard to tell what the main point is. There’s a bit of listing or the point is lost.

 0.0 pts

The response is just a list of facts or personal opinions. It has no idea binding it together and giving a “why”

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExamples & evidence
20.0 pts

Examples are given and then explained or connected to the central idea. It’s clear how they prove the point.

 10.0 pts

Good evidence is given, but it’s not clearly explained or connected back to the ideas/main point.

 5.0 pts

Weak evidence is given. The connection between the example and the point isn’t always clear.

 0.0 pts

The writer gives no examples or specific evidence to back up any points.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
20.0 pts

The response shows real understanding and the ability to connect facts and ideas to get meaning. The student understands how the pieces fit together.

 10.0 pts

Parts of the response show comprehension and the ability to link things together. There is some higher level understanding, but it does not seem strong.

 5.0 pts

Critical thinking is implied. It’s evident that the writer sees connections between some of the material, but (s)he cannot quite integrate them into a larger understanding or meaning.

 0.0 pts

The response lists information or unsupported opinion; it doesn’t show understanding or integration of information

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Expression
20.0 pts

The writing is clear and easy to follow. It makes sense and ideas come through clearly.

 10.0 pts

The writing is mostly clear. Some parts are a little unclear, but most explanations or thoughts are understandable on the first reading.

 5.0 pts

Several parts of the writing are not clear or require re-reading to understand what was intended.

 0.0 pts

The writing is not cohesive or clear. It’s hard to understand the ideas, and it seems the writer may not understand them either!

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality
20.0 pts

The student has come up with the ideas in the response from course material an his/her own understanding. The material and presentation is original or based on correctly MLA CIted research.

 10.0 pts

The writer seems a little uncertain about the ideas (s)he is writing about. Some of the presentation seems as though (s)he drew organization of material or ideas from an online article or source

 0.0 pts

The student has plagiarized or copied ideas, phrases, or terminology from a website or other source without credit.

20.0 pts