information security management security poster using canva

Hello,

Here are the instructions for this assignment:

In an effort to provide security awareness and policy reminders, security posters can be created and displayed, or sent electronically, for employees to review. In this assignment, you will create 3 security posters using templates provided from Canva. You are welcome to use another tool if you wish. There are a ton of information security posters available on the internet but the goal is to make this specific to one’s organization. It must be an original poster. Be creative!

Assignment Instructions

  1. Log into your Canva (Links to an external site.) account that you created in Activity 4.3.
  2. Create three (3) security posters (18″ x 24″) on various aspects of information security.
    • Select “Create a design.”
    • Add a background | select color or design.
    • Select “Elements” and add any images, icons, shapes, lines, etc. that you would like.
    • Add your text.
  3. Download your design as an image. Important Note: To do this, you will need to select the download drop-down box, choose the JPG file type, and select the option to “download a watermarked draft.”
  4. Write a brief paragraph describing the methods you used to develop your design.
  5. Submit your images and paragraph via this assignment.

Reminder: Internet Explorer and mobile browsers are not compatible with Canva. Instead, please use Chrome, Edge, Firefox, or Safari browsers on laptops and desktops. On mobile, Canva offers a free app for Android and iOS.

For support, review the Canva Tutorials (Links to an external site.) or the Canva Help Center.

MGMT 394 4.4 Hands-On Rubric

MGMT 394 4.4 Hands-On Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Development

30.0 pts

(Excellent – A) Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or clearly stated and well supported. Responses are excellent, timely, and address activity, including course concepts. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated.

26.0 pts

(Above-Average – B) Content is accurate and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or stated. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated

23.0 pts

(Average – C) Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.

20.0 pts

(Near-Failing – D) Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Questions were not adequately answered or demonstrated.

17.0 pts

(Failing – F) Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content. Few or no requirements of the activity are included in the response.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Structure

30.0 pts

(Excellent – A) Structure of the activity is clear and easy to follow. Demonstrates excellent flow of thought. Activity is organized and structured in a manner that provides a clear representation of a finished product.

26.0 pts

(Above-Average – B) Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. Finished product is presented.

23.0 pts

(Average – C) Structure of activity is difficult to follow. Product is not finished or if present does not flow from the rest of the activity.

20.0 pts

(Near-Failing – D) Organization and structure detract from the rest of the activity. Points are disjointed and lack in transition of thought.

17.0 pts

(Failing – F) Structure is absent or not consistent. Organization is not apparent and inaccurate. Presentation and delivery are unacceptable.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

25.0 pts

(Excellent – A) Analyses are organized in a logical manner, clearly presented, and titled properly. Activity is easy to understand by a lay reader and directly addresses the research questions.

22.0 pts

(Above-Average – B) Analyses are sufficient in number, but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. Analyses are on topic, but may not perfectly reflect the research questions posed.

19.0 pts

(Average – C) Insufficient analyses/reflection are included. Anayses/reflections do not adequately address the questions posed. Analyses/reflections are not well organized or clear.

17.0 pts

(Near-Failing – D) Analyses/reflections are partially included, but are not clear or organized.

14.0 pts

(Failing – F) Does not demonstrate ability to analyze assumptions and evaluate evidence, complexity of issues, and alternatives.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

15.0 pts

(Excellent – A) Activity demonstrates all designated guidelines in a clear and consise manner with proper formatting. Format enhances readability of work. Demonstrates excellent ability to use technology and tools effectively to enhance the finished product.

13.0 pts

(Above-Average – B) Activity follows all guidelines and technology/tools are used to format the activity appropriately demonstrating a finished product.

11.0 pts

(Average – C) Activity follows most guidelines. Formatting is not consistent and does not represent a finished product.

9.0 pts

(Near-Failing – D) Activity lacks many elements of formatting.

7.0 pts

(Failing – F) Activity is not formatted at all.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

“Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us”
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now